Optic Passport · Configuration record

Trijicon Credo HX

2.5-15x42SFPMOA

This record answers a narrow question: which optic configuration does the indexed evidence describe? Exact retail-SKU identity remains open until primary-source documentation closes it.

Category illustrationExact product image pending verification
Source evaluations11 original source
Documented test stages5/5100% of indexed protocol stages
Identity fields documented61 added by enrichment
Identity fields open6after primary-source review

Identity record

What is documented

Source documented
Brand
Trijicon
Field-evaluation source
Model
Credo HX
Field-evaluation source
Magnification / objective
2.5-15x42
Field-evaluation source
Focal plane
SFP
Field-evaluation source
Adjustment units
MOA
Field-evaluation source

These values identify the configuration named in the public evaluation. Enriched claims below retain their own evidence scope so a family manual is never presented as proof of the tested unit's exact UPC or revision.

Evidence enrichment

What the receipts add

Checked 2026-07-24
Reticle identity
Red MOA Center Dot
Verified fieldTested unitField evaluation ↗
Evidence review flags

The field evaluation identifies the tested reticle, but the former exact product-page URL no longer resolves. The part number remains open until a durable first-party archive is attached.

Scope labels matter: tested unit describes the evaluated optic, exact SKU maps a manufacturer product code, and configuration family applies to the documented model family without proving serial-level identity. A scope match can still remain an evidence lead when its authority or identity chain is incomplete.

Receipts attached

Evaluation history

2022-02
Rokslide field eval

2022-02 zero-retention record

Sample size: 2 · statuses from sample #2; sample #1 eval incomplete after ring slip

Tracking / RTZPass2,000+ MOA dialed on RTZ, no issues
18″ dropsPassNo additional detail
36″ (single)PassNo additional detail
3×36″Passheld zero through the entire drop portion
Long-termPass~3,577 rounds, nothing to report per source

An evaluation documents the tested sample and protocol. It is not automatically a population-level reliability claim.

Make the passport better

Own this optic or its documentation?

A clear model-label photo, packaging label, dated manual, or manufacturer response can close an identity field. Personal reports are useful leads, but they remain separate from verified identity facts.

Send evidence