Optic Passport · Configuration record

Crimson Trace Hardline Pro FFP

4-16x40FFPMRAD

This record answers a narrow question: which optic configuration does the indexed evidence describe? Exact retail-SKU identity remains open until primary-source documentation closes it.

Category illustrationExact product image pending verification
Source evaluations11 original source
Documented test stages3/560% of indexed protocol stages
Identity fields documented50 added by enrichment
Identity fields open7after primary-source review

Identity record

What is documented

Source documented
Brand
Crimson Trace
Field-evaluation source
Model
Hardline Pro FFP
Field-evaluation source
Magnification / objective
4-16x40
Field-evaluation source
Focal plane
FFP
Field-evaluation source
Adjustment units
MRAD
Field-evaluation source

These values identify the configuration named in the public evaluation. Enriched claims below retain their own evidence scope so a family manual is never presented as proof of the tested unit's exact UPC or revision.

Evidence enrichment

What the receipts add

Checked 2026-07-24
Reticle identity
Illuminated MIL tree; exact retail name not documented
Evidence leadTested unitField evaluation ↗
Evidence review flags

The evaluation identifies a 4-16x40 FFP optic; the available manufacturer page documents a 4-16x50 FFP model. They are not treated as the same SKU.

Scope labels matter: tested unit describes the evaluated optic, exact SKU maps a manufacturer product code, and configuration family applies to the documented model family without proving serial-level identity. A scope match can still remain an evidence lead when its authority or identity chain is incomplete.

Receipts attached

Evaluation history

2025-08
Rokslide field eval

2025-08 zero-retention record

Sample size: 1 · single serial number

Tracking / RTZNot testedNo result in source
18″ dropsFailshifted after every drop — total failure per source
36″ (single)Failshifted after every drop — total failure per source
3×36″Failshifted after every drop — total failure per source
Long-termNot testedNo result in source

An evaluation documents the tested sample and protocol. It is not automatically a population-level reliability claim.

Make the passport better

Own this optic or its documentation?

A clear model-label photo, packaging label, dated manual, or manufacturer response can close an identity field. Personal reports are useful leads, but they remain separate from verified identity facts.

Send evidence